Cybercoaching is specifically intended for personalized feedback appropriate for higher levels of thinking (Bloom’s Taxonomy). As I continue to reflect upon this concept, I fear we have lost this element in face to face instruction. I can try to go by someone’s desk, and support them, but many students are hesitant, in a public arena, to let others know they’re struggling. It’s hard to get privacy in a room of 30+ students, whereas in online classrooms, there are options for privacy and more one –to-one with the instructor.
Cybercoaching allows for goal oriented feedback with an opportunity to revise before summative evaluation. I know that I do this when students are working on projects, but unfortunately, in a math classroom where you are trying to “get through” the workbook, or through the curriculum, it’s very difficult to take the time to assist students in learning, at various levels, in a face to face situation to give them personalized attention. How can you do it as an online instructor without spending all your time on the computer?
Part of cybercoaching is to aid students in becoming independent, progressing with “confidence”, and support “student centered learning”. The reading curriculum I used this past year allowed for more student centered learning, but it was very difficult for these young students to vocalize their learning. They were still developing oral language skills, and it also took them time to process the questions asked of them. They were so used to giving answers they thought I expected, it took them at least half the school year to realize I valued their thinking. As a cybercoach, I too am trying to get at student thinking and guide them through analysis.